studEE16A
  • Introduction
  • Linear Algebra
    • Linear Equations
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Vector Spaces
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Inner Products
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Determinants
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Eigen-everything
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Matrices
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Least Squares
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Gram-Schmidt
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Basis
      • Description
      • Example Problems
    • Page Rank
  • Circuits
    • Circuit Basics
    • Capacitance
    • Nodal Analysis
    • Superposition
    • Thevenin and Norton
    • What, When, Where, and Why?
    • Op Amps
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What and why?
  • Example: Thevenin Equivalence
  • Example: Norton Equivalence

Was this helpful?

  1. Circuits

Thevenin and Norton

PreviousSuperpositionNextWhat, When, Where, and Why?

Last updated 5 years ago

Was this helpful?

What and why?

Thevenin and Norton methods are used to simplify any linear circuit to make an equivalent circuit with a single voltage source and resistor connected to a load. Thevenin's Theorem is useful in analyzing circuits where one particular load resistor is subject to change.

When we combine resistors in parallel or in series, we don't care about any of the nodes or branches inside the black box containing the resistive network. We only care about the two terminals that we keep fixed. The resistive network across these terminals is replaced with a single, equivalent resistor.

Now, using Thevenin and Norton, we are trying to find an equivalent circuit to an initial circuit that not only has resistors, but a variety of other sources as well.

Consider attaching an arbitrary voltage to a Thevenin and Norton circuit:

We can find an expression relating i and v for both circuits. For Thevenin, Ohm's law gives us:

As expected, both circuits give us the same relationship!

Example: Thevenin Equivalence

It would be much simpler to instead replace the rest of the circuit with a Thevenin equivalence, reducing the entire circuit down to a single voltage supply and resistor in series:

Now we can determine the voltage differences throughout the circuit using nodal analysis. We should get the following:

Understanding checkpoint: Do you understand how to use the other circuit analysis methods at our disposal to find these values?

Example: Norton Equivalence

We will now find the Norton equivalence for the same circuit as above:

Finding the Norton equivalence requires us to reduce the entire circuit down to a single current source and resistor in parallel:

Note that in this diagram, the arrow notation of the current source points opposite the current flow.

Giving us our complete Norton equivalent circuit:

i=v−VThRTh=vRTh−INi = \frac{v-V_{Th}}{R_{Th}} = \frac{v}{R_{Th}}-I_Ni=RTh​v−VTh​​=RTh​v​−IN​

From Norton, we apply KCL and Ohm's law across RNR_NRN​:

i=vRN−IN=vRTh−INi = \frac{v}{R_N}-I_N = \frac{v}{R_{Th}}-I_Ni=RN​v​−IN​=RTh​v​−IN​

Let's try an example, lifted from :

Returning to our example circuit from the superposition chapter, let's assume that R2R_2R2​ is a variable resistor. While we could still use superposition or nodal analysis to solve for the voltage difference across R2R_2R2​, we would have to repeat this process every time the value of R2R_2R2​ changed, which is time-consuming and tedious:

Let's begin! First, we will replace R2R_2R2​ with an open circuit:

Note the 11.2V11.2 V11.2V voltage difference across what used to be the load resistor terminals. This value is our VthV_{th}Vth​, or ETheveninE_{Thevenin}EThevenin​ in the diagram:

Now we just need to find RthR_{th}Rth​! We do so by removing the voltage supplies and load resistor from our original circuit:

We can see that R1R_1R1​ and R3R_3R3​ are in parallel - thus, the equivalent resistance between what used to be the load resistor's terminals is Req=11R1+1R3=0.8ΩR_{eq} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_3}} = 0.8 \OmegaReq​=R1​1​+R3​1​1​=0.8Ω.

Understanding checkpoint: How do we know R1R_1R1​ and R3R_3R3​ are in parallel?

Substituting ReqR_{eq}Req​ for RthR_{th}Rth​, we have our completed Thevenin equivalent circuit:

Again, we begin by removing R2R_2R2​, our load resistor. This time, we will replace it with a short circuit, and repeat our circuit analysis. We should get the following:

The current across the the short circuit becomes our INoI_{No}INo​ in the Norton equivalent circuit:

We now find RnoR_{no}Rno​ in much the same style as we did RthR_{th}Rth​:

All About Circuits